What are the key principles of an ecological urbanism? And what role might design and planning play in the process?. Ecological Urbanism, now in an updated edition with over forty new projects, considers Edited by Mohsen Mostafavi, Gareth Doherty, co-published by Harvard. The premise of Ecological Urbanism is that an ecological approach is urgently Edited by Mohsen Mostafavi, Gareth Doherty, co-published by.
|Published (Last):||24 April 2011|
|PDF File Size:||20.51 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||16.76 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Every year, more cities are feeling the devastating impacts of this situation. What means do we have as designers to address this challenging reality? For decades now, reminders have come from many sources about the difficulties that face us and our environment. The Brundtland Report ofscientific studies on the impact of global warming, and former U. But a growing concern for the environment is matched by a great deal of skepticism and resistance. The United States has not only failed to ratify the Kyoto Protocol, it is also, along with Canada and many of the Gulf States, among the largest per capita users of energy resources.
The failure of the Copenhagen Summit to produce a legally binding agreement further confirms the scale of the challenges that lie ahead. Architects have been aware of the issues for some time, of course, but the proportion of those committed to sustainable and ecological practices has remained small. And until recently, much of the work produced as sustainable architecture has been of poor quality.
Early examples were focused mainly around the capacities of simple technologies to produce energy and recycle waste. Sustainable architecture, itself rudimentary, often also meant an alternative lifestyle of renunciation, stripped of much pleasure.
Postmodernisms: Theories and Analyses of Architecture II | ECOLOGICAL URBANISM – Mohsen Mostafavi
This has changed and is changing still. Sustainable design practices are entering the mainstream of the profession. In the United Urbajism, LEED certification—the national standard for the evaluation of sustainable buildings—is being more widely applied.
But there remains the problem that the moral imperative of sustainability and, by implication, of sustainable design, tends to supplant disciplinary contribution. Thus sustainable design is not always seen as representing design excellence or design innovation.
This situation will continue to provoke skepticism and cause tension between those mosttafavi promote disciplinary knowledge and those who push for sustainability, unless we are able to develop novel ways of design thinking that can contribute to both domains.
The second issue concerns scale. Much of the work undertaken by sustainable architects has been relatively limited in scope. LEED certification, for example, deals primarily with the architectural object and not with the larger infrastructure of the territory of our cities and towns. Because the challenges of rapid urbanization and limited global resources have become much more pressing, there is a need to find alternative design approaches that will enable us to consider the large scale differently than we have done in the past.
The urban, as the site of complex relations economic, political, social, and culturalrequires an equally complex range of perspectives and responses that can address both current conditions and future possibilities.
The aim of the book Ecological Urbanism is to provide that framework—a framework that through the conjoining of ecology and urbanism can provide the knowledge, methods, and clues of what the urban can be in the years to come. Ecological Urbanism—is that not an oxymoron in the same way that mostafvai hybrid Ecologidal is an oxymoron? How can the city, with all its mechanisms of consumption—its devouring of energy, its insatiable demand for food—ever be ecological?
And yet it is relatively easy to imagine a city mistafavi is more careful in its use of resources than is currently the norm, more energy efficient in its daily operations—like a hybrid car. But is that enough? Is it enough for architects, landscape architects, and urbanists to simply conceive of the future of their various disciplines in terms of engineering and constructing a more energy-efficient environment?
As important as the question of energy is today, the emphasis on quantity—on energy reduction—obscures its relationship with the qualitative value of things. In other words, we need to view the fragility of the planet and its resources as an opportunity for speculative design innovations rather than as a form of technical legitimation for promoting conventional solutions. By extension, the problems confronting our cities and regions would then become opportunities to define a new approach.
Imagining an urbanism that is other than the status quo requires a new sensibility—one that has the capacity to incorporate and accommodate the inherent conflictual conditions between ecology and urbanism. This is the territory of ecological urbanism. There is ample evidence all around us of the scope of the challenge we face. A while ago, a single issue of The Guardian newspaper in the United Kingdom by chance carried three articles that addressed fundamental questions moetafavi sustainability.
The first, by Canadian political journalist Naomi Klein, explored the connections between the invasion of Iraq and the oil boom in Alberta. One method involves open-cast mining. The tar is then chemically diluted and spun around until the oil rises to the top.
A second method involves the drilling of large pipes that push steam deep underground to melt the tar before a second pipe transfers it through various stages of refining. Both of these processes are much more expensive than conventional oil drilling; they also produce three to four times the amount of greenhouse gases.
Despite this, they became financially viable after the invasion of Iraq, and resulted in Canada overtaking Saudi Arabia as the leading supplier of oil to the United States. The extent of this environmental devastation, encompassing land, air, and water—all in aid of relatively cheap oil for the consumer and hefty profits for the oil companies—is a vivid reminder of the urgent need for future conurbations to discover and design alternative and efficient ways of using energy resources.
The building, called Antilla after a mythical island, is equivalent in height to a sixty-story tower block. Jrbanism providing accommodation for Ambani, his mother, his wife, three children, and full-time staff, it comes with its own helipad, health club, and six floors of parking. What are the guidelines for evaluating the impact of a building on the city, not just in terms of its aesthetic appearance but also in relation to its ethical performance?
The third story was about the making of a film, Grow Your Ownwhich chronicles the progress of a group of traumatized asylum-seekers as ecoloical work their inner-city allotment gardens in Liverpool. The film was inspired by the research of a psychotherapist, Margrit Ruegg, who runs a refugee support center.
Her mostaafavi had shown the therapeutic as well as the physical benefits of gardening.
In tending to their vegetables on the plots, alongside their neighbors, the participants are able, in a modest and unsentimental way, to construct a collaborative and productive ground for communication and integration. These three stories are all facets of the multiple realities that our individual and group actions shape in the context of the contemporary urban domain.
Like Mpstafavi, Guattari places emphasis on the role that humans play in relation to ecological practices. The city historically constructed is no longer lived and is no longer understood practically. It is only an object of cultural consumption for tourists, for aestheticism, avid for spectacles and the picturesque. Even for those who seek to understand it with warmth, it is gone.
Yet, the urban remains in a state of dispersed and alienated actuality, as kernel and virtuality. What the eyes and analysis perceive on the ground can at best pass for the shadow of the future object in the light of a rising sun. It is impossible to envisage the reconstitution of the old city, only the construction of a new one on new foundations, on another scale and in other conditions, in another society.
In other words, for what concerns the city the object of science is not given. The past, the present, the possible cannot be separated. What is being studied is a virtual object, which thought studies, which calls for new approaches.
Every discipline has the responsibility to constantly create its own conditions of progress—its own instabilities—and today it is valuable to recognize that we have a unique opportunity to reconsider the core of the disciplines that help us think about the phenomenon of the urban: The prevailing conventions of design practice have demonstrated a limited capacity both to respond to the scale of the ecological crisis and to adapt their established ways of thinking.
In this context, ecological urbanism can be seen as a means of providing a set of sensibilities and practices that can help enhance our approaches to urban development. This is not to imply that ecological urbanism is a totally new and singular mode of design practice.
Rather, it utilizes a multiplicity of old and new methods, tools, and techniques in a cross-disciplinary and collaborative approach toward urbanism developed through the lens of ecology. These practices must address the retrofitting of existing urban conditions as well as our plans for the cities of the future. Given the undulating topography of the city, the promenade affords an ever-changing sectional relationship to its surroundings.
Harvard Design Magazine: Why Ecological Urbanism? Why Now?
As a result, the park produces a different experience of the city compared, for example, to that of a Parisian boulevard. This is achieved through the discovery and construction of stark ecopogical and contrasts that include the experience of the city from different horizon lines. This type of urban recycling of the remnants of the industrial city benefits from the unexpected and given context of the site that needs to be remade, a context mostafwvi from a tabula rasa.
In these ecologicall, the site acts as a mnemonic device for the making of the new. A reference point ecklogical many such contemporary projects is the unbuilt competition entry for the Parc de la Villette by OMA. This process also included a rethinking of the relationship between architecture and landscape, through a suppression of the three-dimensionality of architecture. The operative design procedures ecologicql by OMA—or for that matter by Bernard Tschumi in the selected and subsequently built version of La Villette—are suggestive of the potentials of an ethico-aesthetic design practice that brings together architecture, landscape architecture, and urbanism.
Despite these examples, one could argue that the traditional divisions between architecture, landscape architecture, planning, and urban design are still necessary for the formation and accumulation of specific disciplinary knowledge. But each individual discipline is of limited mostafaavi in responding to the range and diversity of contemporary urban issues.
The pitfalls of acting in isolation become especially evident in the extreme conditions of the urbannism densely populated conurbations around the globe, where it is much harder to identify disciplinary boundaries. While a collaborative mode of working among various areas of design expertise is mandatory in thinking about the contemporary and future city, the transdisciplinary approach of ecological urbanism gives designers mostwfavi potentially more fertile means of addressing the challenges facing the urban environment.
Yet another key characteristic of ecological urbanism is its recognition of the scale and scope of the impact of ecology, which extends beyond the urban territory. The city, for all its importance, can no longer be thought of only as a physical artifact; instead, we must be aware of the dynamic relationships, both visible and invisible, that exist among the various domains of a larger terrain of urban as well as rural ecologies.
Distinctions between rural and urban contingencies can lead to uncertainties and contradictions—calling for unconventional solutions. This regional, holistic approach, with its consequent national and global considerations, demonstrates the multi-scalar quality of ecological urbanism. Much of the knowledge necessary for this mode of design practice can be gained from disciplines such as environmental planning and landscape ecology, with an emphasis on biodiversity.
The insights found at the interface of these disciplines will ultimately provide the most synthetic and valuable material for alternative multi-scalar design strategies. The visionary Italian architect and urbanist Andrea Branzi has for many years espoused the advantages of a different approach toward the city—one that is not reliant on a compositional or typological approach.
Rather, for Branzi it is the fluidity of the city, its capacity to be diffuse and enzymatic in character, that merits acknowledgment. In a series of projects that deliberately blur the boundaries between the disciplines and are as much indebted to art practice as they are to agriculture and network cultureBranzi has proposed an adaptive urbanism based on their symbiotic relationship.
A key feature of this type of urbanism—like the agricultural territory—is its capacity to be reversible, evolving, and provisory. These qualities are necessary in response to the changing needs of a society in a state of constant re-organization.
In particular, the open areas that are no longer in use in many cities, such as New Orleans, could become productive domains where residences, work places, and spaces of leisure could be intertwined. It is a form of nature that resists naturalism and uses its references to the agricultural territory in an operative and temporal way. More specifically, the blurring of boundaries—real and virtual, as well as urban and rural—implies a greater connection and complementarity between the various parts of a given territory.
Conceptually akin to acupuncture, the interventions in and transformations of an area often have a significant impact beyond perceived physical limits. Thinking simultaneously at small and large scales calls for an awareness that is currently unimaginable in many existing patterns of legal, political, and economic activity. One of the major challenges of ecological urbanism is therefore to define the conditions of governance under which it could operate that would result in a more cohesive regional planning model.
The network of relations among multiple localities at different scales provides a window onto the ways in which we could reconsider the implications of developments such as sprawl. There, far from the city core, forests are being cleared for big box stores, high-speed roadways, and low-density subdivisions for long-distance commuters.
One effect can be seen in the alarming rate of increase in the pro portion of Americans who are overweight, from 24 percent into 47 percent into no less than 63 percent today. Surely the problem of obesity is fueled by the ongoing development of residential communities with so much emphasis on the automobile and so little encouragement of walking.